Interesting article, but there is a bug open to fix this now, and it will probably be addressed in the compiler soon - since it makes the code more complex to read I don't think this is really a net win. I don't like the way they are combining naked returns and named return values at the top of the function here, they could at least explicitly return the value.
Interesting article, but there is a bug open to fix this now, and it will probably be addressed in the compiler soon - since it makes the code more complex to read I don't think this is really a net win. I don't like the way they are combining naked returns and named return values at the top of the function here, they could at least explicitly return the value.